TSTP Solution File: ITP035^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP035^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:15:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   9 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  15   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   1   ^   3   !;   0   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    complex: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    deriv_complex: ( complex > complex ) > complex > complex ).

thf(decl_36,type,
    id_complex: complex > complex ).

thf(decl_41,type,
    one_one_complex: complex ).

thf(decl_87,type,
    w: complex ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex @ w )
    = one_one_complex ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_3_deriv__id,axiom,
    ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex )
    = ( ^ [X3: complex] : one_one_complex ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_3_deriv__id) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex @ w )
   != one_one_complex ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])]) ).

thf(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X1261: complex] :
      ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex @ X1261 )
      = one_one_complex ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_3_deriv__id])]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex @ w )
   != one_one_complex ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1293: complex] :
      ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex @ X1293 )
      = one_one_complex ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex @ w )
   != one_one_complex ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2: complex] :
      ( ( deriv_complex @ id_complex @ X2 )
      = one_one_complex ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : ITP035^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 17:51:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.54  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # lpo9_lambda_fix with pid 13490 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by lpo9_lambda_fix
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: HGUSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting lpo8_s with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # lpo8_s with pid 13493 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Result found by lpo8_s
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.54  # Search class: HGUSM-FSLM32-MHSFFSBN
% 0.21/0.54  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.54  # Starting lpo8_s with 163s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.54  # Parsed axioms                        : 433
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 118
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses                      : 498
% 0.21/0.54  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 36
% 0.21/0.54  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 462
% 0.21/0.54  # Processed clauses                    : 5
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...remaining for further processing  : 5
% 0.21/0.54  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4
% 0.21/0.54  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.54  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.21/0.54  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 457
% 0.21/0.54  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1069
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.21/0.54  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.21/0.54  # Condensation attempts                : 5
% 0.21/0.54  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.54  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 34351
% 0.21/0.54  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 10084
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54  # User time                : 0.035 s
% 0.21/0.54  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Total time               : 0.042 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 4428 pages
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.54  # User time                : 0.047 s
% 0.21/0.54  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Total time               : 0.059 s
% 0.21/0.54  # Maximum resident set size: 2548 pages
% 0.21/0.54  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------